Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Lauria's avatar

A bottle that lives on the table gets used most days. One at the back of the cupboard gets used at Christmas. That is the whole argument about the markup, because the price per pour ends up a completely different number. The olive oil wave learned this the slow way. People bought the good bottle, decided it was too good to use, and never bought a second. Precious is what kills a premium staple.

Thabata Regiani's avatar

This new wave of redesigns and "optimization" seems to have been coming for everything, and in many cases, it has been largely positive.

However, what I fail to understand in this case, as well as the case of Graza, is how they want to push a premium and/or healtier product and make a decision to sell it in a plastic bottle - at a premium price, no less. Even as we learn more about how these packages are damaging to both environments and bodies, we are drowning in plastic.

To me, that is when all the storytelling crumbles and becomes not only suspiciously performative, but also, arguably makes the packaging worse just for the sake of trend. Sure, maybe the soy sauce glass jar did pour some globs at a time, but is this why we should pump tons of plastic into the environment for? Is that the very best solution we can find?

I think optimization is different than slapping a cute cat on a bottle that will outlive civilization and try to convince us that this is an improvement because you don't have to wipe the cap of your bottle after using it.

Anyway... Sorry about the grumpy rant. Ultimately, the issue is that I am not the target audience here, and I am not on social media 😂

No posts

Ready for more?